Dear All,
Yesterday I received a message from the Wikipedia editor who reviewed our article, with a rejection, explaining that s/he hadn't seen the term circulating, and therefore our article was original research.
This surprised me because the Wikipedia editors I spoke with before we pitched our terms in October had been familiar with the Wiki book on Rhetoric and Writing in the Public Sphere, had seen the term circulating in practice, and had thought the term could be viable for Wikipedia. It's also possible that this editor/reviewer isn't familiar with the growing number of courses or syllabi in public sphere writing (at Duke, JMU, St. Francis College, etc.).
So, it may be that another lead or a different introduction can help to better contextualize the term as the trend it is actually becoming. As with most Wikipedia projects, the draft page can still be updated, edited, and reviewed. It can also be submitted again for review. And of course, you may download it to keep it intact, if you wish.
-Prof. Graban
Jan 23, 2015
Jan 9, 2015
Wikipedia Class Project Update (January 2015)
Dear All:
If you have been checking this space for an update on our class project from last term, I can finally report that it is one of 631 articles flagged for review. To access the review draft, you can find our article on "Public Sphere Writing" in the left-hand column (halfway down) of this page. I will post again once it has been approved. In the meantime, I'd like to say this article is something you can and should be proud of.
Happy New Year,
-Prof. G
If you have been checking this space for an update on our class project from last term, I can finally report that it is one of 631 articles flagged for review. To access the review draft, you can find our article on "Public Sphere Writing" in the left-hand column (halfway down) of this page. I will post again once it has been approved. In the meantime, I'd like to say this article is something you can and should be proud of.
Happy New Year,
-Prof. G
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)